January 13, 2010

Catwoman verus Dogman

I just started internet dating again.
Scratch that. I just started thinking about the possibilities of internet dating again. And posted a new profile on a couple of sites.

Consequently, I've spent a few hours reading other people's profiles.

And profile after profile after profile has a photo of a man and his dog.
And an invitation to meet "my best friend" or a caveat "must like dogs".

Why do men think this is appealing?
Scratch that too.
I know that women find this appealing.
WHY????

And why is it that a man with a dog is considered desirable and a woman with a cat is considered sad? A woman with two cats is well on the way to becoming a "cat woman" (and that's cat woman, not Catwoman) whilst a two dogged man is even more desirable.

I do not desire a man with a dog, fawning all over it like it's a baby and not being able to make plans after work because their dog does not like to be left alone.
No no no.
Blarrghghghghhgg. (That's me vomiting)

January 11, 2010

Incredible in bed

It's been a while. Is anyone still reading???

A friend and I were just chatting online about whether we'd pursue a long distance relationship.
He said that he would only if she was "incredible in bed". Which got me to thinking on this cold Monday morning...

Incredible in bed:
The ability to wash sheets and remake the bed so that it looks like a hotel room.
The ability to rise earlier than I do and come back to bed bringing me a well made cup of tea.
The ability to get into bed before I do, warm it up and not complain about my cold feet.

The list goes on.

Here is what incredible in bed looks like to me right now:

August 28, 2009

What's so exciting about a chick driving a stick?

I am coming to the end of my vacation in England.
It's been good. The weather has been cooperative, as have the children and my parents.
Old friends have been marvelous.
For the most part, a success.

I've also had the chance to drive a lot which is good. It's a treat to want to go somewhere and just hop in the car and do so, rather than schlep to the subway or railway station. It's also a fabulous accessory when buying lots of groceries. I like it.

Many American men I have met in person or via their online profile have expressed an opinion that driving a stick shift is sexy. Why is that?
Given that 99% of the cars here are stick, that means that 99% of British women must be sexy and that is plainly not the case. Just wander around any branch of Roys of Wroxham and you will see hard evidence of this fact.

We don't even call them sticks. We just call them cars. The daft things that you people insist on are labelled "automatics" and, in my opinion, they are for dummies.

Driving a car with a manual gear box isn't difficult in the least, so why is it sexy?
Is it that the chick in question has to grab a penis shaped object in order to make the car go?
Probably, given the number of youporn videos featuring skinny women impaling themselves onto the gear stick and displaying considerably more thigh strength than the average bird.

But doesn't that make all men that drive sticks sexy too?

Having driven an automatic briefly in LA, the main difference I've observed is that driving a stick requires that you concentrate. Which, given that you are in control of a lethal weapon, is probably appropriate.

Although, having a manual allows you to drop down into second, hit the accelerator hard and overtake a car quickly when you haven't really got room to. And I used to like doing that. Before I started ferrying kids around and turned into a nervous nellie.

Anyway, driving has been fun. I shall miss it.
Back on Tuesday...

July 31, 2009

Just say no!

Did anyone in the entire history of the modern world ever look cool in a bandana?

I don't think so.

Bandanas and dew rags look stupid. Please, world population, resist the urge to put them on.

July 25, 2009

Lazy is as lazy does.


Brace yourselves - about to bash yer peeps again...

Here's an inquiry:

Say you had a decent sized 700 square foot apartment on the third floor with large windows on both sides and a delightful cross breeze on a relatively calm day and quite a substantial breeze on a windy day like today. And say it got a little warm.

What would you do?

If you were Danish, or Hungarian, or French, or English even, I can say from recent experience that you would open all the windows and let the fresh (as it can be in Brooklyn) air in.

If you were American, on the other hand, you would keep the windows shut as tight as a virgin's twat and turn on the air conditioner.

What a lazy-arsed bunch of lazy-arses. You people would rather be doused in mechanically cooled air rather than open a window because if you open it you'll have to expend more energy to close the damned thing later. Horror of horrors!

No surprise for guessing who invented the remote control.

Newsflash: Air conditioning is not essential. If it was essential, it would be used world wide and it just isn't. On top of that, it's bad for your health and even worse for the environment. The New York subway requires that you carry a sweater when the outdoor temperature is 85 degrees because it's so unbearably cold on the train. There's a budget deficit, yet no one can quite arrive at the startling fact that the subway doesn't need to be 60 degrees. Bunch of divvies.

Summer gives you an opportunity to wear less clothes and drink more water - cool yourselves down people. And turn off the freakin A/C.

July 19, 2009

Girls will be girls. Boys will be boys.

It's very hard to find a moment to record one's thoughts when the children are rampaging around, chores need to be done and friends should be seen before we leave for our summer hols in England.

Things were busy enough even before last weekend's spanner in the works. (Err, that would be wrench for you Americans)

Last weekend, the kids started scratching. There had been several outbreaks of head lice throughout the school year (which is what happens when you let the white people in, but that's a story for another day) and we were very relieved to have escaped the trend.

Or so we thought.

The scratching increased and so, at an event in the park with a bunch of other parents from school, I asked my friend to check their heads. I'd been looking, but it's one of those cases that if you don't know what you're looking for, you really don't know when you've found it.
Long story short - lice it was.

I immediately went to the nearest chemist (err, drug store. I am practising my English for Blighty next week) and bought 3 boxes of Rid and texted the kids father to meet us at our house.
When he finally showed up, he went into a google frenzy and announced that the product was poison. Well, poisonous beyond the obviously desired poisonous-to-lice-ness. When you read that a product is designed to be used only twice in a lifetime, you kinda know that you don't want it on your kids head.

Alternate options were explored and, to cut another long story short, we spent 4 hours and $330 at "The Lice Lady" in Carroll Gardens having the buggers combed out.

I'd love to say that that was the end of the matter, but I've had to comb their hair out myself every other day since and have to continue to do so until two weeks have passed. Fun it is not.

Now my children, as you can see from this:
have the most glorious heads of hair. We refer to them as having afros, but in fact they don't at all. In size and, to an extent, shape, they do, but that's where the comparison ends completely. They don't have an inch of kink in their hair and in fact the smaller kid has many straight strands on his beautiful head. What they have is very thick, very curly, very soft, hair. (A bit more kink, and the lice might have left us alone hence the comment at the outset)

I love their hair. It's like a trademark and the quickest and easiest way for me to tell a fellow parent which kids belong to me. I've said a million times "the ones with the hair" and everyone knows who I am talking about.

Last week, almost everyone that heard of our woes said "you're going to buzz their hair right?"

Nope. Not me.

Yes, combing out that hair has been a bloody nightmare. Yes, it would have been easier to just shave it all off. But so what that it would have been easier? New York is too full of choices made for children that are easier for parents - more about that another day too, since that's not the topic of this particular little rant.

Here's the topic: If they had been girls, noone would have thought to make the suggestion that I shave their heads. If they were girls, it would just be assumed that we would deal with it as is - or maybe at the very most have a trim to make life a little simpler.

Because the appearance of girls is important, apparently, and the appearance of boys is not.
Boys should not trouble themselves with the way they look. Girls should not dare to forget it.

Got that? Because it's practically set in stone and perpetuated by even the most "thinking" of people.

And yet you thinkers complain when your grown men can't be bothered to put on a decent outfit to go out for dinner. Or, when they go overboard in adulthood at the chance to actually consider their appearance, you complain that they are metrosexuals and won't get out the bathroom.
You complain that your girlfriends won't climb walls or get themselves dirty.

And you will complain when your girls are hairdressers and my boys are engineers.

July 12, 2009

Newsflash for New York women.

OK, I have a newsflash for all women living in New York City.
If you are not already sitting down, you might want to take a seat because this news is startling and might cause fainting or other physical signs of distress.

Ready?

Brace yourself because this might come as quite a shock to some of you...

OK, here goes:

It is not compulsory to partake in yoga classes simply because you live in New York.

See, I said it was a shocker.

To all those women busy trying to bend themselves into impossible positions not because they want to, but because they thought they were somehow contractually obliged to by dint of their chosen city of residence (gasps for breath) let me release you from your imagined obligation.

If you Internet date and live in New York you may be particularly convinced that yoga is a mandatory activity and that normal life could not be sustained without it.

You would be mistaken.

And here's another newsflash:
Yoga is not the only way to exercise. You can run, or swim or even walk. You can meditate if you so choose, but it doesn't have to be done whilst inexplicably staring at your own ass.

Almost every freaking chick I know does yoga. Some do it casually, some regular, some almost religiously. Several even teach other buggers to do it.

Once in a while, I succumb to the badgering of various of these friends and I take a class. It irritates the shit out of me. The teachers invariably are the kind of people I would hit across the face with a shovel if I thought I could get away with it. (My own dear yoga teaching friends notwithstanding. Although I have to confess that if I took one of your classes I'd probably feel the same way about you. Sorry)

You have to do it more often they say. But why? I don't like doing it.
When I discover that I don't like an activity, taste, person - whatever the case may be - I do my darnedest to avoid them/it.

This pressure to don comfortable, yet stylish clothing and make like a downward dog is particularly strong in the white community. A white chick in New York not doing yoga may feel as if it is her against the world.

But it is not. I ain't doing it either.

Namaste.

July 9, 2009

New Photo and annoying results.

I just changed my profile photos and now the lead one is this one:

Can't decide if I look cute or just plain old though. My besties on facebook are saying the former, mostly, so I will roll with that.

Anyway, it's given my Nerve dating profile a new lease of life since I've been viewed a couple hundred more times since the change (pushing the 18,000 views mark which is tragic when you consider that I haven't met anyone that I want to have a relationship with).

I've been hotlisted by a few oldies though, so maybe the old airheadgenius photo was a bit too young and flattering. I've also got a few new emails today.

One guys email seemed reasonably promising so I checked out his profile.

Deal breaker. Fatally flawed. Not even going to get out the gate.

Of the 10 ethnicities up for grabs for his potential date, he had chosen but 3.
Note to my little tiny readership, lest any of you be Nerve daters jonesing for one airheadgenius: I have no interest and very little respect for anyone that cherry picks their dates based on ethnicity.

More on this later, but first I must do the dishes and put the children to bed.
Whilst you're waiting, what do you think of the new photo?

July 8, 2009

Bloody idiot


I am so mad at myself right now.

Today, the small people and I ran errands in the morning, then met friends in the park in the afternoon. The errands involved schlepping to Home Depot with the granny cart and picking up various DIY items for the house and yard.

Whilst over in Bed Stuy, we did a quick reccie of the large and seemingly glorious outdoor pool at Kosciusko and then, having walked home, mosied over to a playground near BAM.

The point here is that we were walking (or scooting in the case of the smalls) for a couple hours.

And here's why I am a bloody idiot:

I have a killer sunburn. The entire area above my shirt - a scoop in the back and the chest - is a deep, unappealing brick red. The forecast was for the high seventies so, stupido that I am, I thought that not applying sun screen was no biggie.

Wrong.

How many times have I made this same mistake? About a thousand.
How many years does it take for me to embrace the fact that I am a white person and that I burn very easily? Apparently more than 42.

We were supposed to be going to said outdoor pool tomorrow and the beach on Friday. Which will not help matters remotely. Unfortunately, it was an airhead dominant day.

June 26, 2009

Tweeted


Just a quickie...

I haven't had much of a chance to write anything - clearly - for the last week or so. It's the last day of school tomorrow and there have been myriad school events, plus work, plus chores so it's been hectic.

But I just had to make a little comment on the day that Michael Jackson died.

WTF is wrong with the world when we hear about fellow entertainment industry celebrities having "tweeted" their feelings about Jacko's death??? Celebrities that were, apparently, actual friends of his.

Now, his death may not be important in the grand scheme of things - in a world with wars and famine - but it's still a death. I would have thought that making a statement about it if you were indeed one of his pals, could be done with a little more gravitas than 140 characters on Twitter.

I can't stand the fact that at least two major networks on their evening - supposedly serious - newscasts, spoke in solemn tones about poor deceased Michael and used the expression "Tweeted".

Yeah, it's official - I hate the new face of social networking.

June 17, 2009

Cravings


Toasted bagel with cream cheese and lox
Warm croissant with butter
Waffles
Yorkshire Pudding
Molten chocolate cake
Scones with clotted cream
Jamaican Pattie
Jam doughnut
Custard Tart
Shortcake
French bread
Jacobs cream cracker
Digestive chocolate biscuits
Tarte tartin

The list is endless.
Coeliac disease sucks.

June 10, 2009

Dumb and Dumber

Just browsed through Crate and Barrel's sale offerings.

There's a pretty umbrella for a decent price advertising itself as "eco". I was interested to know what that meant when pertaining to umbrellas, so I checked out the blurb.

I learned that one of its features is that it's "waterproof".

How delightfully useful for an umbrella!!! I would hate to order it and find that it's not waterproof and is actually made of paper.

Full disclosure when purchasing a product can be a very good thing. For example, in England where the government is not in the pocket of the food corporations, it is required that a bag of peanuts contains the allergen information "this product contains nuts" . Silly in that instance, but of course overwhelmingly useful most of the time.

But surely we can assume that a fucking umbrella is waterproof?

(This brought to you by the "Stop dumbing things down" bureau)